Skip to main content

Lifeboat (1944)

Lifeboat film poster
Other than his two propaganda shorts for the British Ministry of Information, Aventure malgache and Bon Voyage (both 1944), Alfred Hitchcock never showed much interest in making war films. The closest he came to the genre was 1944's Lifeboat. Lifeboat was also one of Hitchcock's occasional experiments in making a film set in only one location.

The film opens with a passenger ship being sunk in the Atlantic by a German U boat, after which an assortment of survivors gather together in the same lifeboat. From then on the film is set entirely in this one location, with only a limited cast of characters. The survivors include an unsympathetic high society journalist (Tallulah Bankhead), a millionaire industrialist (Henry Hull), a nurse (Mary Anderson), and an evacuee mother (Heather Angel) who is still carrying her dead baby. There are also four crewmen from the sunken ship – William Bendix, John Hodiak, Canada Lee and Hume Cronyn (oddly cast as an English sailor).

As the U-boat was itself also sunk, one of the crew members (Walter Slezak) also finds his way into the boat. Although he initially pretends to be an ordinary seamen, the other survivors eventually discover he was in fact the submarine's captain. He also has his own supply of water and a concealed compass. The survivors have to deal with the elements, the lack of supplies and DIY amputations, while in the background Hodiak and Bankhead develop a sexually charged love-hate relationship across the class divide. When the German submarine captain emerges as the most competent leader, the group have to decide whether to trust him and his navigating, which is allegedly designed to take them to Bermuda.

Lifeboat is based on an unlikely premise and there is rather more talking, singing and flute playing that you might expect from a group of people with barely a drop to drink. But the film has a classic set up that's hard to resist - take a disparate group of shipwreck survivors in a desperate situation and put them together with the man who sank them. The film raises questions of politics, if often obliquely, as well as the moral dilemmas and questions of trust that the survivors must face.

The characters are stock types, but this is probably deliberate. They represent a cross section of society; rich, poor, young, old, black, white, male, female, even workers and capitalists, and it's not too much of a stretch to see an element of political allegory. The survivors are lost, confused and disorientated, uncertain of who should lead or where they should go. Then a natural leader emerges among them, the German captain. He is the most experienced and competent, is physically strong and an authority figure, knows seamanship and navigation, and promises to lead them to safety. But where exactly is it that he is leading them to?

Hume Cronyn, Henry Hull, Tallulah Bankhead, John Hodiak, Mary Anderson, Canada Lee
To 21st century eyes, the German captain looks like a reasonably stereotypical nasty Nazi. But the character caused controversy at the time, as he is seemingly the most capable and competent of those on board, and plays into stereotypes of the ubermensch and Nazi invincibility. Bosley Crowther of the New York Times argued that with only a little editing the film could be turned into Nazi propaganda, while The Writers War Board attacked it as a "credo of German super-intelligence and of the degeneracy of the democratic peoples." A modern audience would probably be more likely to notice the treatment of Canada Lee as the black seaman, who is charmingly referred to as “Charcoal” by Bankhead's character, although it may not be that inaccurate for her character and the time period.

Among a cast of mostly character actors, it's Bankhead who has the closest thing to a star part as the cynical journalist. This was her first film in Hollywood for a decade (excepting a cameo as herself in Stage Door Canteen), and marked probably her best screen performance. She was named Best Actress by the New York critics, but Lifeboat didn't lead to a revival of her film career and she returned to the stage after one more film, A Royal Scandal (1945).

It was Hitchcock himself who came up with the story idea for Lifeboat, and no doubt it was the technical challenge of filming in such a confined space that most attracted him to it. His first choice for screenwriter was Ernest Hemingway, but when he passed, John Steinbeck was chosen instead. The film is billed as “Alfred Hitchcock's production of John Steinbeck's Lifeboat”, but little of Steinbeck's script was used and his name was employed mainly to give it some more critical respectability. The final screenplay was credited to Jo Swerling, but a variety of uncredited writers were used, including Mrs Hitchcock (Alma Reville) and Ben Hecht, who was hired to give the script a final polish.

The film was shot entirely in the studio tank, with the cast enduring their fair share of disasters, including Bankhead catching pneumonia, and Hume Cronyn breaking two ribs filming the scene where he is swept off the boat. The film never leaves its one setting and, to aid realism, there is no musical score, except over the titles. The wittiest part of the film is Hitchcock's traditional director's cameo. Given the limited setting and paucity of characters, this must have been a tough one to incorporate. In the end, Hitch's picture appears in the before and after photos for a weight loss advert in a newspaper read by one of the characters.

Lifeboat was filmed on a budget of just over $ 1.5m and was one of Hitchcock's less commercially successful films. It did, however, net him his second Academy Award nomination as best director. That Oscar nod was well deserved, because Lifeboat again shows Hitchcock's command of technique and his willingness to experiment. Despite stereotypical characters and obvious propaganda intent, Lifeboat turns out to be a fairly sturdy vessel. Although the premise is unlikely, the plight of torpedoed survivors was a topical one and the film still has the power to shock and surprise. Compared to Hitchcock's later restricted-setting films, Lifeboat is oddly half-forgotten, but it really shouldn't be. This is one of the most successful of Hitchcock's experimental films, and his handling of the material and the technical challenges here is first rate.


Year: 1944
Genre: Thriller, War, Drama
Country: USA
Director: Alfred Hitchcock

Cast Tallulah Bankhead (Constance Porter), William Bendix (Gus Smith), Walter Slezak (Willi), Mary Anderson (Alice MacKenzie), John Hodiak (John Kovac), Henry Hull (Charles Rittenhouse), Heather Angel (Mrs. Higley), Hume Cronyn (Stanley Garrett), Canada Lee (Joe Spencer)

Screenplay Jo Swerling  story John Steinbeck  Producer Kenneth MacGowan  Cinematography Glen MacWilliams  Art direction James Basevi, Maurice Ransford  Editor Dorothy Spencer  Music Hugo Friedhofer    

Running time 90 mins (black and white)
Production company/Distributor  Twentieth Century Fox


Popular posts from this blog

The Liquidator (1965)

“The name's Oakes. Boysie Oakes.”

It doesn't really work, does it? But in the mid 1960s everyone was trying to cash in on the James Bond craze. Rival spy series included Matt Helm, Harry Palmer, Bulldog Drummond and Derek Flint. MGM's hopes for a Bond rival were pinned on Rod Taylor as Boysie Oakes in The Liquidator.

Taylor's character is an ex-army sergeant who is inducted into the British secret service by spy master Colonel Mostyn (Trevor Howard). Mostyn has been tasked by his boss (Wilfrid Hyde-White) to recruit an agent to carry out unofficial assassinations off the books. Mostyn recalls an incident in wartime Paris, shown in a black and white flashback sequence, when he was rescued by Oakes from two would-be assassins. Unbeknown to him, Oakes's heroics were mostly accidental. Oakes goes along with the plan, smitten as he is with the money he's paid, the E-Type Jaguar he's given, the swanky '60s bachelor pad apartment and the endless parade of bea…

The 39 Steps (1935)

For me, The 39 Steps is the quintessential Hitchcock film. Other films may have weightier themes or a more complex subtext, but The 39 Steps boils the Hitchcock thriller down to its essential elements – a shocking murder, an innocent man on the run, a beautiful blonde and a MacGuffin so irrelevant that few people can remember what it was all about.

The film is based on John Buchan's 1915 novel The Thirty-Nine Steps, but the translation to film is so loose I think “inspired by” would probably be the more accurate description. In fact, the film strays so far from the novel that the writers had to create a new explanation for the title, having forgotten to include the actual steps that feature in the book.

The hero of Buchan's novel is Richard Hannay. On a visit to London from South Africa, he finds himself mixed up in a spy plot when one of his neighbours, a freelance American agent called Scudder, is murdered by enemy spies. He had stumbled onto a sinister plot and has crucial…

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

In the mid-1970s the James Bond series was in trouble. Harry Saltzman, one half of the original Bond producing partnership, was embroiled in financial difficulties with his outside business interests, and left the series following 1974's The Man with the Golden Gun. That film had been the least successful in the history of the Bond series, rushed into release the year after the more successful Live and Let Die. The first two Roger Moore films had latched onto popular trends in contemporary cinema, Blaxploitation in the case of Live and Let Die, and the kung fu craze in The Man with the Golden Gun, but the Bond series was looking increasingly like a 1960s hangover on its last legs.

The next Bond film then, the 10th in the "official" Eon Productions series, was something of a make or break effort for Bond. Albert R. Broccoli was now the sole remaining producer of the series, and he gambled that audiences were ready again for a dose of grand escapism. The next film would b…